Tuesday March 7, 2006

Making sense of metadata: a mega-list of links for lawyers

Comments (1)   TrackBacks (0)   E-mail this article

Everyone's talking about metadata -- but everyone's not talking about the same issue.

Some are talking about the inadvertent disclosure of confidential or sensitive information through metadata contained in an electronic document -- for example, the hidden revision history of a document transmitted to opposing counsel by e-mail.  The possibility of such inadvertent disclosure raises a variety of issues, including:

  • Does a lawyer violate client confidentiality, or commit legal malpractice, by transmitting an electronic document to an adverse party without taking pains to remove metadata which reveals something material about the client's interests -- for example, something about the client's bargaining position?  and
  • Is is unethical for the recipient to probe the metadata of the document for information which the sender did not intend  for the recipient's eyes?  Does the sender waive any claim to the confidentiality of the information that appears in metadata, by allowing the document to be transmitted with the metadata in place?

    Stated another way, is probing for metadata no different than closely examining a document passed across the table in a deposition?  Or is it more analogous to looking through opposing counsel's papers during the lunch hour?

Other commentators are talking about a related but distinct issue -- that is, the role of metadata in electronic discovery.  Litigators who seek or oppose the discovery of corporate records are quickly beginning to realize that the surficial content of an electronic record -- for example, the visible text of an in-house e-mail message -- is not the entire "ball of wax" where probative evidence is concerned.

In other words, a law firm that decides to "send someone in the office to a seminar on metadata" might find that two different types of seminars are being offered:  one about risk management, another about electronic discovery!

I have also noticed that, to some degree at least, there are two different threads of commentary about metadata on the Internet. One thread emanates from the legal tech community; the other from the legal ethics community. That's a good thing, except for the fact that they sometimes seem to be talking past each other. The technology wonks focus on technical possibilities, problems and solutions, while the ethics wonks focus on the ethical implications and competing ethical obligations. 

I have a foot in each of those camps; consequently I see the listserv messages, the blog posts and the magazine articles that emanate from each.  So I thought I would take a moment to pass along my own "working list" of links to on-line resources about metadata.  Here it is:   

[Thanks to Dennis Kennedy, Tom Mighell, David Hricik, and all others who have provided pointers to these resources.]

About the author

Trackbacks

TrackBacks:


Comments

THOMASON visited this page on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, and wrote:

Does metadata have any great value, typically? It is expensive to get and to authenticate, so it needs to be worth something more. Generally, the value is measured in terms of (A) how much burden one side can put on the other in producing electronic files, or (B) how metadata can make the other side look like liars, i.e., it's used for collateral attacks. Less frequently, the metadata yields substantive proof of a material fact.
The best use of metadata, in my clouded view, would be as a theme for a Spy vs. Spy cartoon about gamemanship in e-discovery.


 



Post a comment

Use this form to post a comment about "Making sense of metadata: a mega-list of links for lawyers."

Your comment will be reviewed for relevance and propriety before it is added to the comments section of this page. The author reserves the right to disapprove any comment that is found to be inappropriate.